I caught an article on Yahoo earlier but couldn’t get it to load but when I was on CNN earlier, I found a similar link that gave the full story.
I’m sure we can all remember when the news was pushing the whole OJ Simpson trial and how it was a big sham, and blah blah blah. Pretty much everyone I know figured the guy did in fact kill Nicole but of course, between lawyers and the lovely American justice system, he got off without a hitch in the criminal trial. He got hit with a civil lawsuit that ultimately was supposed to cost him 33.5 million dollars but he hasn’t paid much of that out yet.
Regardless, we’re back to it again. Now he has a book and a TV interview that is, and I quote, “If I did it, here’s how”. It’s both a book and an interview where OJ writes/talks about how hypothetically, if he had killed Nicole, this is how he would have done it. Of course it’s all “hypothetical” and not a confession. Uh huh. Sure.
It really is very disturbing to know that a man killed two people, was set free, and now 10 years later can write a book about how he killed them, go on TV and talk about how he did it, and it’s all perfectly fine.
Yes I know. The legal system said he was innocent and we should believe it. Do you?
Do you think OJ did it, and if he didn’t, why write a book about how he WOULD have done it? How fracked up do you have to be to do that? *shudder*
